Microsoft & Linkedin Hookup Schism Anti-Trust Law, Salesforce Petition


Microsoft & Linkedin Hookup Schism Anti-Trust Law, Salesforce Petition

California’s cloud computing company, Salesforce, is asking the respective EU legal authorities to probe the deal between Microsoft and LinkedIn, citing competition and unlawful monopoly concerns.

An article from the Wall Street Journal informs Microsoft’s move would give the company an unfair advantage because it could allegedly block competitor’s access to customer information, and risk user’s data privacy.

Microsoft responded by saying Salesforce was complaining about unfair advantages in a field in which they are current leaders, which is the Customer Relations Management (or CRM) market.

Microsoft’s agreement with LinkedIn

On June 13, 2016, Microsoft announced it had finally purchased LinkedIn, at the cost of $196 per share for a total of $26.2 billion, including LinkedIn’s net cash. The merger would not mean the dispersal of LinkedIn, as they would allegedly retain their independence.

Jeff Weiner, current CEO of the most famous professional social network would have to report to Satya Nadella, Microsoft’s CEO, nonetheless.

Salesforce’s claims: Well-founded complaints or the rants of a sore loser?

Salesforce was one of the bidders for LinkedIn when they went on sale, and quickly lost to Microsoft. The WSJ article points out that, if they had won the bidding and acquired LinkedIn, their argument could be used against them.

Salesforce’s concern is that Microsoft will block competitors from accessing or partnering with LinkedIn, but there is no solid foundation or previous evidence to certify this theory.

The only concrete action that they have taken to contest this merger has been appealing to the European Commission, the last governing body waiting to give their approval for Microsoft’s deal. The purchase has already been allowed in the United States, Canada, and Brazil.

This case could be taken to trial on the grounds of non-compliance with ‘antitrust law,’ meaning that Microsoft is making the purchase solely to create a market monopoly and not for the benefit of users.

Salesforce’s argument is tainted, however, by the fact that they continued to contact LinkedIn after the merger was announced, offering them higher bids and urging them to reconsider.

For more details visit : http://theusbport.com/salesforce-claims-microsoft-linkedin-merger-violates-anti-trust-laws/17987

 

Summary
Article Name
Microsoft & Linkedin Hookup Schism Anti-Trust Law, Salesforce Petition
Description
Microsoft & Linkedin Hookup Schism Anti-Trust Law, Salesforce Petition - California’s cloud computing company, Salesforce, is asking the respective EU legal authorities to probe the deal between Microsoft and LinkedIn, citing competition and unlawful monopoly concerns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *